Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 37: e056, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1439745

ABSTRACT

Abstract To investigate the influence of the remaining volume of a new intracanal medication based on bioceramic compounds on the bond strength (BS) and formation of an adhesive interface between calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers. For this purpose, the specimens were distributed according to the intracanal medication (n = 26): Bio-C Temp (BCT) and Ultracal XS (UXS). The roots were scanned in microCT, and after 7 days, the medication was removed. Then a new scan was performed to evaluate the volume of medication remaining. Subsequently, 40 specimens were redistributed into 2 subgroups (n = 10) and filled according to the sealer used: AH Plus (AHP) and Bio-C Sealer (BCS), to assess the bond strength by using the push-out test, and the adhesive interface by confocal laser fluorescence microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The t test showed a smaller remainder of BCT (1.77 ± 0.86) compared with UXS (10.47 ± 5.78), irrespective of the root third evaluated. The BS showed that teeth with BCT + BCS had higher bond strength values (3.70 ± 1.22) when compared to the other groups: BCT + AHP (2.15 ± 1.07), UXS + BCS (3.18 ± 1.09) and UXS + AHP (2.11 ± 1.02) (p<0.001). The cervical third had higher BS when compared with the middle and apical thirds (p < 0.001), and higher number of adhesive failures. The adhesive interface in SEM and CLSM images showed better adaptation for the association between BCT + BCS. Intracanal medication and silicate-based endodontic sealer appeared to interact chemically by forming a biomineralizing layer, allowing for an increase in the bond strength and forming an adhesive interface between the materials, with no or less gap formation.

2.
Rev. cuba. estomatol ; 56(3): e2176, jul.-set. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1093236

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Introducción: La mayoría de los estudios han evaluado y comparado la exactitud de los localizadores apicales electrónicos pero pocos evaluaron la repetibilidad del método de medición; de estos casi todos son ex vivo. Objetivo: Comparar la repetibilidad in vivo de tres localizadores apicales electrónicos en dientes antero-superiores permanentes. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional analítico de corte transversal en 14 pacientes adultos sanos de ambos sexos con indicación de tratamiento de conductos en una pieza dentaria antero-superior. La selección fue por casos consecutivos. Se utilizaron tres localizadores apicales electrónicos (Root ZX II, Canal Pro y RomiApex A-15) para realizar las mediciones de los conductos. Dos operadores independientes realizaron dos mediciones con cada localizador apical electrónico. Los datos se analizaron por medio de la prueba de Bland-Altman para la repetibilidad y la prueba de Friedman para comparar los localizadores apicales. Resultados: La edad media (desviación estándar) de los pacientes fue 28,79 (± 9,12) años; 8 (57,1 por ciento) pacientes fueron del sexo femenino. La media de las diferencias (límites de concordancia) de las mediciones para Root ZX, Canal Pro y RomiApex A-15 fueron 0,13 mm (± 0,42), 0,12 mm (± 0,88), y 0,18 (± 0,76) mm, respectivamente. Conclusiones. El Root ZX presentó el mayor grado de repetibilidad, seguido por el RomiApex. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los localizadores en cuanto a las diferencias absolutas entre la 1ra y 2da mediciones(AU)


ABSTRACT Introduction: Most studies have evaluated and compared the accuracy of electronic apex locators, but few have addressed the repeatability of the measurement method, and most are ex vivo. Objective: Compare the in vivo repeatability of three electronic apex locators in permanent upper front teeth. Methods: An analytic observational cross-sectional study was conducted of 14 healthy adult patients of both sexes with root canal therapy indicated in an upper front tooth. The consecutive case method was used to select the patients. Three electronic apex locators (Root ZX II, Canal Pro and RomiApex A-15) were used for root canal measurement. Two independent operators performed two measurements with each electronic apex locator. Data were analyzed using the Bland-Altman test to assess repeatability and the Friedman test to compare the apex locators. Results: Mean age (standard deviation) of the patients was 28.79 (± 9.12) years; 8 patients (57.1 percent) were female. The mean differences (limits of agreement) of the measurements made by Root ZX, Canal Pro and RomiApex A-15 were 0.13 mm (± 0.42), 0.12 mm (± 0.88) and 0.18 (± 0.76) mm, respectively. Conclusions: Root ZX displayed the highest repeatability, followed by RomiApex. Statistically significant variations were not found between the locators as to absolute differences between the 1st and 2nd measurement(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Root Canal Therapy/adverse effects , Proof of Concept Study , Odontometry/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Observational Study
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL